Civic learning in Czech educational debate: Changes of the concept in the 20th century between educational sciences and school practice

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11576/jsse-7832

Abstract

Highlights:

- Civic education in interwar democratic Czechoslovakia as a way to civic emancipation and worldview tolerance.

- Active methods of civic education in education - the example of interwar Czechoslovakia.

- Political instrumentalisation and ideologization of civic education: the example of communist Czechoslovakia.

- 1968 and the Prague Spring: changes and breakdowns of the reform model of civic education in Czechoslovakia.

- Civic education in totalitarian systems: educational goals, curriculum, teaching methods, role of the teacher, extra-curricular education.

Purpose: The aim of this study is to reconstruct the development of civic learning within Czech debate during two periods: 1. the interwar period; 2. the communist era in Czechoslovakia.

Design and approach: The study is based on printed materials related to educational policy –laws, educational programmes, curriculum documents and teaching journals. Using a text-analytical and hermeneutic approach, it reconstructs the direction and “power of discourse” within educational policy concerning civic learning in Czech debate in the 20th century.

Findings: The first part of the study reconstructs the formation of the concept of civic learning seeking to link the national and cosmopolitan models of coexistence (the curriculum of civic learning, civic learning in the wider school life, the didactic concept of teaching and the implementation of active forms of teaching civic studies and education). The second part of the study analyses both the changes and stability (macrodidactic and microdidactic levels; curricular and methodological levels) of the ideological Marxist orientation of civic learning (as a school subject and as school life) in communist Czechoslovakia.

Research limitations: The report is based on the analysis of educational policy documents, i.e. primary sources of the “official” educational debate, only partially taking into account the levels of actors (teachers, pupils, parents), “transfer” and implementation from the political curriculum level (macrodidactic level) to the level of implementation of objectives and contents in teaching (microdidactic level).

References

Benecke, J. (Ed.). (2022). Erziehungs und Bildungsverhältnisse in der DDR [Upbringing and education in the GDR]. Klinkhardt.

Birzea, C. (2008). Back to Europe and the second transition in Central Eastern Europe. Orbis Scholae, 2(2), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2018.238

Blessing, B., Grammes, T., & Schluss, H. (2012). Civics courses in the German Democratic Republic (GDR): A case study in the history of curriculum and educational research. JSSE - Journal of Social Science Education, 11(2), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.4119/jsse-596

Dvořáková, M., & Lánský, O. (2024). Národní, globální, anebo kosmopolitní: české občanské vzdělávání na rozcestí [National, global, or cosmopolitan: Czech civic education at a crossroads]. Orbis scholae, 17(3), 9–31. https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2024.11

Grammes, T., Schluß, H., & Vogler, H. J. (2013). Staatsbürgerkunde in der DDR [Civics in the GDR]. Wiesbaden.

Greger, D. (2011). Dvacet let českého školství optikou teorií změny vzdělávání v post-socialistických zemích [Twenty years of Czech education through the lens of theories of educational change in post-socialist countries]. Orbis scholae, 5(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2018.70

Greger, D., & Najvar, P. (2010). Editorial: Educational change in the global context. Orbis Scholae, 4(2), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2018.122

Halász, G. (2007). From deconstruction to systemic reform: Educational transformation in Hungary. Orbis Scholae, 1(2), 45–79. https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2018.166

Janík, T. (2013). Od reformy kurikula k produktivní kultuře vyučování a učení [From curriculum reform to a productive culture of teaching and learning] Pedagogická orientace, 23(5), 634–663. https://doi.org/10.5817/PedOr2013-5-634

Janík, T. (Ed.). (2020). Curriculum changes in the Visegrad Four: Three decades after the fall of communism: Studies from Hungary, Poland, the Czech and Slovak Republics.Waxmann.

Janík, T., Najvar, P., & Solnička, D. (2011). Od idejí k implementaci: Kurikulární reforma v rozhovorech s řediteli (nepilotních) gymnázií [From ideas to implementation: curriculum reform in interviews with (non-pilot) grammar school directors]. Orbis scholae, 5(3), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2018.79

Janowski, A. (2007). Educational restructuring and change: Post-communist educational transformation in Poland. Orbis Scholae, 1(2), 80–108. https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2018.167

Kasper, T. (2007). Výchova či politika? Úskalí německého reformně pedagogického hnutí v Československu v letech 1918-1933 [Education or politics? The pitfalls of the German pedagogical reform movement in Czechoslovakia in 1918-1933]. Karolinum.

Kasper, T., & Kasperová, D. (2020). "Nová škola" v meziválečném Československu ve Zlíně: Ideje, aktéři, místa [The "new school" in interwar Czechoslovakia in Zlín: ideas, actors, places]. Academia.

Kasper, T., Kasperová, D., & Pánková, M. (Eds.). (2018). "Národní" školství za první Československé republiky [‘National’ education in the First Czechoslovak Republic]. Academia.

Kasper, T., Kasperová, D., & Šmelová, E. (2024). Transfer as a basic characteristic of Czech school reform: The interwar Czechoslovak education reform movement and its resistance to “best practices” from abroad. History of Education and Children's Literature, 19(2), 161-181. https://doi.org/10.48219/1342

Keller, R. (2011). Diskursforschung [Discourse research]. VS Verlag.

Keller, R., Hornidge K., & Schünemann, J. W. (2018). The sociology of knowledge approach to discourse. Routledge.

Kosová, B., & Porubský, Š. (2007). Educational transformation in Slovakia: The ongoing search for a solution. Orbis Scholae, 1(2), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2018.168

Kudláčová, B. (2023). Education as a political tool of the communist regime in Slovakia. Pamiec i Sprawiedliwosc, 42, 59–78. https://doi.org/10.48261/pis234204

Medveš, Z. (2015). Socialist pedagogy: Caught between the myth of the fairness of the unified school and cultural hegemony. Sodobna pedagogika. Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies, 66(2), 14–41.

Mitter, W. (2010). Between retrospect and expectation: Trends and dimensions of education in East Central Europe. Orbis Scholae, 4(2), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2018.125

Protner, E. (Ed.). (2020). Razvoj i aktualne tendencije pedagogije i školstva na području nekadašnje Jugoslavije [Development and current tendencies of pedagogy and education in the territory of the former Yugoslavia]. University of Maribor Press.

Schriewer, J. (2003). Problemdimensionen sozialwissenschaftlicher Komparistik [Problem dimensions of social science comparative studies]. In J. Schriewer & H. Kaelble (Eds.), Vergleich und Transfer. Komparatistik in den Geschichts-, Sozial- und Kulturwissenschaften (pp. 9–54). Campus.

Štech, S. (2013). Když je kurikulární reforma evidence-less [When curriculum reform is evidence-less] Pedagogická orientace, 23(5), 615–633. https://doi.org/10.5817/PedOr2013-5-615

Tenorth, H. E., & Wiegmann, U. (2022). Pädagogische Wissenschaft in der DDR: Ideologieproduktion, Systemreflexion und Erziehungsforschung [Pedagogical Science in the GDR. Ideology production, system reflection and educational research]. Klinkhardt.

Veselý, A. (2015). Národní rada pro vzdělávání 1994–2014: Geneze záměru a příčiny jeho neuskutečnění [National Education Council 1994−2014: The genesis of the idea and the reasons of its non-realization]. Orbis Scholae, 9(1), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2015.70

von Kopp, B. (2010). Do we need comparative education in a globalised world? Orbis Scholae, 4(2), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2018.123

Zounek, J., Šimáně, M., & Knotová, D. (2017). Normální život v nenormální době [Normal life in abnormal times]. Wolters Kluwer.

Zounek, J., Šimáně, M., & Knotová, D. (2018). "You have betrayed us for a little dirty money!"The Prague Spring as seen by primary school teachers. Paedagogica Historica, 54(3), 320–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/00309230.2017.1394884

Walterová, E. (2007). The transformation of educational systems in the Visegrád countries: Introduction to the context of comparative research. Orbis Scholae, 1(2), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2018.164

Walterová, E., & Greger, D. (2007). Pursuit of educational change: Transformation of education in the Czech Republic. Orbis Scholae, 1(2), 11–44. https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2018.165

Downloads

Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    12
  • PDF
    12
Further information

Published

2025-07-03

How to Cite

Kasper, T., & Kasperova, D. (2025). Civic learning in Czech educational debate: Changes of the concept in the 20th century between educational sciences and school practice . JSSE - Journal of Social Science Education, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.11576/jsse-7832

Issue

Section

Country Report