Citizenship Education, spatial justice and social imagination: Constructive principles for curriculum and democracy

Authors

  • Hélder Ferraz Centre for Research and Intervention in Education, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8504-2426
  • Ricardo Soares Centre for Research and Intervention in Education, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1955-7832
  • João Moisés Cruz Centre for Research and Intervention in Education, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8003-4697

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11576/jsse-8466

Keywords:

citizenship education, powerful knowledge, social imagination, spatial justice, critical pedagogy

Abstract

Highlights:

- Citizenship education is conceptualised as a space of social imagination and justice.

- “Powerful knowledge” is linked to the capacity to imagine and act collectively.

- Outcome-based education is associated with the narrowing of civic and democratic agency.

- Spatial justice shapes how imagination and hope are unevenly distributed.

- A circular, three-year model connects knowledge, territory, and civic action.

Purpose: This article examines citizenship education as a space for social imagination and spatial justice, arguing that the interplay between powerful knowledge and social imagination offers a framework for rethinking democratic education in contexts shaped by outcome-based and employability-driven policies.

Design/methodology/approach: A theoretical interpretive approach draws on hermeneutic and critical perspectives from social philosophy, sociology of education, and critical pedagogy. The paper develops a conceptual synthesis linking epistemic justice, imagination, and hope, and proposes a long-term pedagogical model for school practice.

Findings: The analysis identifies three dynamics that constrain the democratic potential of citizenship education: a) the instrumentalisation of knowledge through performative accountability; b) the erosion of public trust and increased political polarisation and populism; and c) spatial inequalities that limit the capacity to imagine alternative futures. The articulation between powerful knowledge and social imagination highlights the potential of schools as sites of civic engagement and collective meaning-making.

Research limitations/implications: The article contributes to future research on civic imagination and spatial justice, particularly in contexts of social vulnerability, by proposing analytical tools and indicators for curriculum development and teacher education.

Practical implications: A circular three-year model supports democratic learning through cycles of knowledge development, territorial mapping, dialogue, and collective action, positioning schools as spaces where knowledge and imagination are connected in practice

Author Biographies

Ricardo Soares, Centre for Research and Intervention in Education, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto

Ricardo Soares has a degree and a master’s in Education Sciences. He is a PhD Fellow (FCT funded, 2021.04599.BD) at the Centre for Research and Intervention in Education (CIIE), Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto. So far, his research has focused on populism, youth civic and political participation, new media (mainly social media), digital and media literacies, and political and media education.

João Moisés Cruz, Centre for Research and Intervention in Education, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto

João Moisés Esteves da Cruz holds a master’s degree in educational sciences from the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences of the University of Porto. He is currently a PhD student in Educational Sciences at the same faculty. Through a doctoral scholarship from the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), with the reference 2022.11327.BD., he is developing his research at the Centre for Educational Research and Intervention (CIIE), entitled "Public Education Policies in the Context of the Digital Transition." His research has focused on political discourse in education.

References

Abrams, Samuel E. (2016). Education and the commercial mindset. Harvard University Press.

Appadurai, Arjun (2004). The capacity to aspire: Culture and the terms of recognition. In V. Rao & M. Walton (Eds.), Culture and public action (pp. 59–84). Stanford University Press.

Apple, M. W. (2018). The struggle for democracy in education. In The struggle for democracy in education (pp. 1-19). Routledge.

Arthur, James (2003). Education with character: The moral economy of schooling. Routledge.

Ball, Stephen J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093022000043065

Berg, Anne E., Jungblut, Jens, & Jupskås, Anders R. (2023). We don’t need no education? Education policies of Western European populist radical right parties. West European Politics, 46(7), 1312–1342. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2023.2177010

Bernstein, Basil (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique (Rev. ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.

Biesta, Gert (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315634319

Biesta, Gert (2017). Education, measurement and the professions: Reclaiming a space for democratic professionality in education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(4), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2015.1048665

Biesta, Gert (2020). Risking ourselves in education: Qualification, socialization, and subjectification revisited. Educational Theory, 70(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12411

Bloch, Ernst (1986). The principle of hope (N. Plaice, S. Plaice, & P. Knight, Trans.). MIT Press.

Bourdieu, Pierre (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.

Castoriadis, Cornelius (1987). The imaginary institution of society. Polity Press.

Díez-Gutiérrez, Enrique-Javier, & Jarquín-Ramírez, Mauro-Rafael (2025). Políticas educativas de la extrema derecha en Europa: ¿La conformación de una Internacional de Ultraderecha en Educación mediante una agenda común? [Educational policies of the far right in Europe: the formation of a Far-Right International in education through a common agenda?]. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 33. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.33.8848

Eurydice. (2017). Citizenship education at school in Europe – 2017. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2797/536166

Ferraz, Hélder (2025). From promise to capture: The limits of compensatory education and the territorial politics of equity. Policy Futures in Education, 24(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103251381955

Fraser, Nancy (2009). Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalizing world. Columbia University Press.

Freire, Paulo (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed.). Continuum. (Original work published in 1968)

Freire, Paulo (2013). Pedagogia da esperança: Um reencontro com a pedagogia do oprimido [Pedagogy of hope: a reencounter with the pedagogy of the oppressed]. Paz e Terra. (original work published in 1992)

Garcés, Marina (2023). Novo iluminismo radical [The new radical enlightenment] (H. Pitta, Trans.). Orfeu Negro.

Giroux, Henry A. (1997). Pedagogy and the politics of hope: Theory, culture, and schooling – A critical reader. Westview Press.

Gutmann, Amy (1999). Democratic education. Princeton University Press.

Habermas, Jürgen (1984). The theory of communicative action, Volume 1: Reason and the rationalization of society (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Beacon Press.

Holloway, Jessica (2021). Democracy and education: Why pluralism matters. In Jessica Holloway (Ed.), Metrics, standards and alignment in teacher policy (pp. 157–168). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4814-1_11

hooks, bell (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.

Hussey, Trevor, & Smith, Patrick (2008). Learning outcomes: A conceptual analysis. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510701794159

Isac, Maria Magdalena, Zels, Saskia, & Abs, Hermann Josef (2024). Approaches to monitoring citizenship education in Europe (PrEval Expertise No. 2/2024). Zentrum für Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung / Hochschul-Studienberatung, Universität Duisburg-Essen. https://preval.hsfk.de/fileadmin/PrEval/PrEval_Expertise_02_2024.pdf

Levitas, Ruth (2013). Some varieties of utopian method. Irish Journal of Sociology, 21(2), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.7227/IJS.21.2.3

Lima, Licínio C. (2021). Democracy and education: Dewey in times of crisis in democratic education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 29, 154. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.29.5881

Mandel, Ernest (2002). Anticipation and hope as categories of historical materialism. Historical Materialism, 10(4), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1163/15692060260474459

Marshall, Thomas H. (1950). Citizenship and social class and other essays. Cambridge University Press.

Massey, Doreen (1994). Space, place and gender. U. Minnesota Press.

Meadows, Michelle, Yu, Guoxing, Baird, Jo-Anne, & Broadfoot, Patricia (2025). Competence, competition, content and control: Sociological perspectives on educational assessment. Oxford Review of Education, 51(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2025.2457873

Mezirow, Jack (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass.

Mouffe, Chantal (2018). For a left populism. Verso.

Oelkers, Jürgen (2023). Populist challenges to democratic education. In J. Culp, J. Drerup, & D. Yacek (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of democratic education (pp. 512–530). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009071536

Olssen, Mark, Codd, John, & O’Neill, Anne-Marie (2004). Education policy: Globalization, citizenship and democracy. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221501

Rancière, Jacques (2004). The politics of aesthetics: The distribution of the sensible. Continuum.

Ribeiro, Norberto, Neves, Tiago, & Menezes, Isabel (2014). Educação para a cidadania em Portugal: Contributos para analisar a sua evolução no currículo escolar português [Citizenship education in Portugal: contributions to the analysis of its evolution in the Portuguese school curriculum]. Currículo sem Fronteiras, 14(3), 12–31. https://www.curriculosemfronteiras.org/vol14iss3articles/ribeiro-neves-menezes.htm

Sant, Edda (2021). Political education in times of populism. Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76299-5

Schulz, Wolfram, Ainley, John, Fraillon, Julian, Losito, Bruno, Agrusti, Gabriella, Damiani, Valeria, & Friedman, Tim (2024). ICCS 2022 international report: Education for citizenship in times of global change. Springer; IEA.

Sellar, Sam, & Lingard, Bob (2013). The OECD and the expansion of PISA: New global modes of governance in education. In H.-D. Meyer & A. Benavot (Eds.), PISA, power, and policy: The emergence of global educational governance (pp. 185–206). Symposium Books.

Soares, Ricardo, Ferreira, Pedro, & Malafaia, Carla (2024). Pode a educação atenuar o crescimento do populismo e da extrema-direita? O papel da escolaridade e das experiências educacionais na construção da democracia [Can education mitigate the rise of populism and the far right? The role of schooling and educational experiences in the construction of democracy] . Educação, Sociedade & Culturas, 69. https://doi.org/10.24840/esc.vi69.1127

Soja, Edward W. (2013). Seeking spatial justice. University of Minnesota Press.

Stoer, Stephen R., & Magalhães, António M. (2005). A diferença somos nós: A gestão da mudança social e as políticas educativas e sociais [We are the difference: the management of social change and educational and social policies]. Edições Afrontamento.

Taylor, Charles (2004). Modern social imaginaries. Duke University Press.

Van Dermijnsbrugge, Elke, & Chatelier, Stephen (2022). Utopia as method: A response to education in crisis? Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(sup1), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2022.2031870

Watson, Cate (2019). From accountability to digital data: The rise and rise of educational governance. Review of Education, 7(2), 390–427. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3125

Westheimer, Joel (2015). What kind of citizen? Educating our children for the common good. Teachers College Press.

Wheelahan, Leesa (2012). Why knowledge matters in curriculum: A social realist argument. Routledge.

Young, Michael (2008). From constructivism to realism in the sociology of the curriculum. Review of Research in Education, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07308969

Young, Michael (2013). Overcoming the crisis in curriculum theory: A knowledge-based approach. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(2), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2013.764505

Downloads

Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    170
  • PDF
    110
Further information

Published

2026-05-07

How to Cite

Ferraz, H., Soares, R., & cruz, J. M. (2026). Citizenship Education, spatial justice and social imagination: Constructive principles for curriculum and democracy. JSSE - Journal of Social Science Education, 25. https://doi.org/10.11576/jsse-8466

Issue

Section

Article - Open Call