Educational orientation, actively open-minded thinking, and democratic ideals in the assessment of news credibility
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11576/jsse-7686Keywords:
social science education, actively open-minded thinking, higher education, misinformation susceptibilityAbstract
Highlights:
- Democratic knowledge and perspectives correlate with misinformation discernment (MD).
- Higher education in all academic orientations correlates positively with MD.
- Low dogmatism and low fact-resistance correlate positively with MD.
- Self-rated information literacy aligns with objective performance in MD.
- Disciplinary differences are associated with different democratic ideals.
Purpose: This study examines how educational orientation, actively open-minded thinking (AOT), and democratic ideals relate to misinformation discernment in an era of misleading media content.
Methodology: Using an online survey, nationally representative adults (n=3060) and university students (n=1097) completed measures assessing misinformation discernment, AOT, democratic ideals, and information literacy.
Findings: Higher education improves misinformation discernment, though no differences emerged across academic disciplines. AOT, especially low dogmatism and fact resistance, strongly predicts misinformation resilience. Democratic ideals, emphasising representation and expertise, enhance discernment, while participatory ideals show weaker links. Self-rated information literacy correlates with better discernment, yet advanced techniques like lateral reading and reverse image search remain rare. Political orientation influences outcomes, with Green-voting individuals performing better and right-wing Sweden Democrats performing worse.
Implications: The findings emphasise the need to integrate critical thinking, democratic education, and digital fact-checking skills into curricula across disciplines, actively promoting AOT and fostering nuanced democratic perspectives.
References
Altay, S., Hoes, E., & Wojcieszak, M. (2024). News on social media boosts knowledge, belief accuracy, and trust: A field experiment on Instagram and WhatsApp. OSF. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/hq5ru
Altay, S., Nielsen, R. K., & Fletcher, R. (2023). News can help! The impact of news media and digital platforms on awareness of and belief in misinformation. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612221148981
Arechar, A. A., Allen, J., Berinsky, A. J., Cole, R., Epstein, Z., Garimella, K., Gully, A., Lu, J. G., Ross, R. M., Stagnaro, M. N., Zhang, Y., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2023). Understanding and combating misinformation across 16 countries on six continents. Nature Human Behaviour, 7, 1502–1513. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01641-6
Aslett, K., Sanderson, Z., Godel, W., Persily, N., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. A. (2024). Online searches to evaluate misinformation can increase its perceived veracity. Nature, 625(7995), Article 7995. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06883-y
Axelsson, C.-A. W., Guath, M., & Nygren, T. (2021). Learning how to separate fake from real news: Scalable digital tutorials promoting students’ civic online reasoning. Future Internet, 13(3), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13030060
Axelsson, C.-A. W., & Nygren, T. (2024). The advantage of videos over text to boost adolescents’ lateral reading in a digital workshop. Behaviour & Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2308046
Baron, J. (1993). Why teach thinking? An essay. Applied Psychology, 42(3), 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1993.tb00731.x
Baron, J. (2019). Actively open-minded thinking in politics. Cognition, 188, 8–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.004
Baron, J., Isler, O., & Yilmaz, O. (2022). Actively open-minded thinking and the political effects of its absence. In V. Ottati & C. Stern (Eds.), Divided: Open-mindedness and dogmatism in a polarized world (pp. 162–182). Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197655467.003.0009
Bateman, J., & Jackson, D. (2024). Countering disinformation effectively: An evidence-based policy guide. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2024/01/countering-disinformation-effectively-an-evidence-based-policy-guide?lang=en
Bengtsson, Å. (2012). Citizens’ perceptions of political processes: A critical evaluation of preference consistency and survey items. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 70(extra_2), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2012.01.29
Bengtsson, Å., & Christensen, H. (2016). Ideals and actions: Do citizens’ patterns of political participation correspond to their conceptions of democracy? Government and Opposition, 51(2), 234–260. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2014.29
Breakstone, J., Smith, M., Wineburg, S., Rapaport, A., Carle, J., Garland, M., & Saavedra, A. (2021). Students’ civic online reasoning: A national portrait. Educational Researcher, 50(8), 505–515. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211017495
Bronstein, M. V., Pennycook, G., Bear, A., Rand, D. G., & Cannon, T. D. (2019). Belief in fake news is associated with delusionality, dogmatism, religious fundamentalism, and reduced analytic thinking. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(1), 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.09.005
Buchanan, T., Maras, K., & Dando, C. (2025). Individual differences in detecting and sharing misinformation: Positive schizotypy, conspiracy beliefs, and autism. Personality and Individual Differences, 233, 112946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2024.112946
Campbell, D. E. (2019). What social scientists have learned about civic education: A review of the literature. Peabody Journal of Education, 94(1), 32–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2019.1553601
Caulfield, M., & Wineburg, S. (2023). Verified: How to think straight, get duped less, and make better decisions about what to believe online. University of Chicago Press.
Dunwoody, P. T., Gershtenson, J., Plane, D. L., & Upchurch-Poole, T. (2022). The fascist authoritarian model of illiberal democracy. Frontiers in Political Science, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2022.907681
Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Schmid, P., Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N., Kendeou, P., Vraga, E. K., & Amazeen, M. A. (2022). The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-021-00006-y
Eckstein, K., Noack, P., & Gniewosz, B. (2013). Predictors of intentions to participate in politics and actual political behaviors in young adulthood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 37(5), 428–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025413486419
Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction (The Delphi Report). Insight Assessment.
Facione, P. A. (2000). The disposition toward critical thinking: Its character, measurement, and relationship to critical thinking skill. Informal Logic, 20(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v20i1.2254
Fitz, E. B., & Saunders, K. L. (2024). Distrusting the process: Electoral trust, operational ideology, and nonvoting political participation in the 2020 American electorate. Public Opinion Quarterly, 88(SI), 843–857. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfae025
Goldstein, J. A., Chao, J., Grossman, S., Stamos, A., & Tomz, M. (2024). How persuasive is AI-generated propaganda? PNAS Nexus, 3(2), pgae034. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae034
Guath, M., & Nygren, T. (2022). Civic online reasoning among adults: An empirical evaluation of a prescriptive theory and its correlates. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.721731
Guess, A. M., Lerner, M., Lyons, B., Montgomery, J. M., Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., & Sircar, N. (2020). A digital media literacy intervention increases discernment between mainstream and false news in the United States and India. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(27), 15536. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920498117
Higher Education Act (SFS 1992:1434). Swedish Code of Statutes. https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/hogskolelag-19921434_sfs-1992-1434/
Jøsok, E., & Kjøstvedt, A. (2023). Politisk mestringstro og kontroversielle spørsmål i samfunnsfag [Political self-efficacy and controversial issues in social studies]. Nordidactica: Journal of Humanities and Social Science Education, 13(2023: 3), 109–130. https://journals.lub.lu.se/nordidactica/article/view/25019
Kosberg, E., & Grevle, T. E. (2022). Review of international civic and citizenship study data analyses of student political efficacy. In R. Desjardins & S. Wiksten (Eds.), Handbook of civic engagement and education (pp. 235–247). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800376953.00029
Kozyreva, A., Lorenz-Spreen, P., Herzog, S. M., Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Hertwig, R., Ali, A., Bak-Coleman, J., Barzilai, S., Basol, M., Berinsky, A. J., Betsch, C., Cook, J., Fazio, L. K., Geers, M., Guess, A. M., Huang, H., Larreguy, H., Maertens, R., … Wineburg, S. (2024). Toolbox of individual-level interventions against online misinformation. Nature Human Behaviour, 8, 1044–1052. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01881-0
Kross, E., & Grossmann, I. (2012). Boosting wisdom: Distance from the self enhances wise reasoning, attitudes, and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024158
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., & Cook, J. (2017). Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008
Mahmood, K. (2016). Do people overestimate their information literacy skills? A systematic review of empirical evidence on the Dunning-Kruger effect. Communications in Information Literacy, 10(2), 199–213.
Maertens, R., Götz, F. M., Golino, H. F., Roozenbeek, J., Schneider, C., Kyrychenko, Y., Kerr, J., Stieger, S., McClanahan, W., Drabot, K., He, J., & van der Linden, S. (2024). The Misinformation Susceptibility Test (MIST): A psychometrically validated measure of news veracity discernment. Behavior Research Methods, 56, 1863–1899. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02124-2
Makowski, D. (2018). The psycho package: An efficient and publishing-oriented workflow for psychological science. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(22), 470. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00470
McGrew, S. (2024). Teaching lateral reading: Interventions to help people read like fact checkers. Current Opinion in Psychology, 55, 101737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101737
McGrew, S., Breakstone, J., Ortega, T., Smith, M., & Wineburg, S. (2018). Can students evaluate online sources? Learning from assessments of civic online reasoning. Theory & Research in Social Education, 46(2), 165–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2017.1416320
Morosoli, S., Van Aelst, P., Humprecht, E., Staender, A., & Esser, F. (2022). Identifying the Drivers Behind the Dissemination of Online Misinformation: A Study on Political Attitudes and individual characteristics in the context of engaging with misinformation on social media. American Behavioral Scientist, 69(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642221118300
Nilsson, A., Grindbo, N., Aspernäs, J., & Erlandsson, A. (2024, January 15). Politically motivated bullshit receptivity: Ideology, epistemology, and receptivity to pseudo-profound bullshit across domains. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9p2bq
Nilsson, A., Montgomery, H., Dimdins, G., Sandgren, M., Erlandsson, A., & Taleny, A. (2020). Beyond ‘liberals’ and ‘conservatives’: Complexity in ideology, moral intuitions, and worldview among Swedish voters. European Journal of Personality, 34(3), 448–469. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2249
Nygren, T., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2024). Education as a countermeasure against disinformation. Psychological Defence Research Institute, Lund University .
Nygren, T., & Guath, M. (2019). Swedish teenagers’ difficulties and abilities to determine digital news credibility. Nordicom Review, 40(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0002
Nygren, T., & Guath, M. (2022). Students evaluating and corroborating digital news. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(4), 549–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.1897876
Osborne, J., & Allchin, D. (2024). Science literacy in the twenty-first century: Informed trust and the competent outsider. International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2331980
Osborne, J., & Pimentel, D. (2022). Science, misinformation, and the role of education. Science, 378(6617), 246–248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abq8093
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2018). Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition, 188, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011
Pennycook, G., Ross, R. M., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2017). Dunning–Kruger effects in reasoning: Theoretical implications of the failure to recognize incompetence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(6), 1774–1784. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1242-7
Peterson, B. E., Duncan, L. E., & Pang, J. S. (2002). Authoritarianism and political impoverishment: Deficits in knowledge and civic disinterest. Political Psychology, 23(1), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00272
Pnevmatikos, D., Christodoulou, P., & Georgiadou, T. (2019). Promoting critical thinking in higher education through the values and knowledge education (V a KE) method. Studies in Higher Education, 44(5), 892–901. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1586340
Porter, T., Elnakouri, A., Meyers, E. A., Shibayama, T., Jayawickreme, E., & Grossmann, I. (2022). Predictors and consequences of intellectual humility. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(9), 524–536. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00081-9
Reichert, F. (2016). How internal political efficacy translates political knowledge into political participation: Evidence from Germany. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 12(2), 221–241. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v12i2.1095
Revelle, W. (2024). psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research (Version 2.4.6.26) [Computer software]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/psych/index.html
Roozenbeek, J., Maertens, R., Herzog, S. M., Geers, M., Kurvers, R. H., Sultan, M., & van der Linden, S. (2022). Susceptibility to misinformation is consistent across question framings and response modes and better explained by open-mindedness and partisanship than analytical thinking. Judgment and Decision Making, 17(3), 547–573. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500003570
Roozenbeek, J., Schneider, C. R., Dryhurst, S., Kerr, J., Freeman, A. L., Recchia, G., Van Der Bles, A. M., & Van Der Linden, S. (2020). Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world. Royal Society Open Science, 7(10), 201199. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201199
Sanders, L. (2023, June 29). How well can Americans distinguish real news headlines from fake ones? YouGov. https://today.yougov.com/politics/articles/45855-americans-distinguish-real-fake-news-headline-poll
Schulz, W., Carstens, R., Losito, B., & Fraillon, J. (2018). ICCS 2016: International civic and citizenship education study 2016. IEA. https://www.iea.nl/studies/iea/iccs/2016
Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Losito, B., Agrusti, G., Valeria, D., & Friedman, T. (2023). Education for citizenship in times of global challenge: IEA International Civic and Citizenship Education Study 2022 international report. IEA. https://www.iea.nl/publications/iccs-2022-international-report
Scott, R. (2022). Does university make you more liberal? Estimating the within-individual effects of higher education on political values. Electoral Studies, 77, 102471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102471
Shanahan, C., Shanahan, T., & Misischia, C. (2011). Analysis of expert readers in three disciplines. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(4), 393–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296x11424071
Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2012). What is disciplinary literacy and why does it matter? Topics in Language Disorders, 32(1), 7–18. doi:10.1097/TLD.0b013e318244557a https://journals.lww.com/topicsinlanguagedisorders/abstract/2012/01000/what_is_disciplinary_literacy_and_why_does_it.3.aspx
Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2013). Myside bias, rational thinking, and intelligence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413480174
Stevens, R., Wineburg, S., Herrenkohl, L. R., & Bell, P. (2005). Comparative understanding of school subjects: Past, present, and future. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 125–157. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075002125
Svedholm-Häkkinen, A. M., & Lindeman, M. (2018). Actively open-minded thinking: Development of a shortened scale and disentangling attitudes towards knowledge and people. Thinking & Reasoning, 24(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2017.1378723
The SOM Institute. (2024). Den nationella SOM-undersökningen 2023: En metodöversikt. SOM-rapport 2024:4 [The national SOM survey 2023-A methodological overview. SOM Report No. 2024:4]. Gothenburg University. https://www.gu.se/sites/default/files/2024-05/Den%20nationella%20SOM-unders%C3%B6kningen%202023.pdf
Tväråna, M. (2019). Kritiskt omdöme i samhällskunskap: Undervisningsutvecklande studier av samhällsanalytiskt resonerande i rättvisefrågor [Critical judgment in social studies: teaching-development studies of socio-analytical reasoning in issues of justice] [Doctoral dissertation, Stockholms universitet]. DiVA Portal. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1386883
Tväråna, M., & Jägerskog, A.-S. (2023). Civic reasoning about power issues: The criticality of agency, arena and relativity. Journal of Social Science Education, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.11576/jsse-5258
Van der Linden, S. (2023). Foolproof: Why misinformation infects our minds and how to build immunity. HarperCollins.
van Prooijen, J.-W., & Krouwel, A. P. M. (2019). Psychological features of extreme political ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(2), 159–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418817755
Vecchione, M., Caprara, G. V., Caprara, M. G., Alessandri, G., Tabernero, C., & González-Castro, J. L. (2014). The perceived political self-efficacy scale–short form (PPSE-S): A validation study in three Mediterranean countries. Cross-Cultural Research, 48(4), 368–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397114523924
Weyringer, S., Patry, J.-L., Pnevmatikos, D., & Brossard Borhaug, F. (2022). What is VaKE? In S. Weyringer, J.-L. Patry, D. Pnevmatikos, & F. B. Børhaug (Eds.), The VaKE handbook: Theory and practice of values and knowledge education (pp. 3–11). Brill.
Wineburg, S., & McGrew, S. (2019). Lateral reading and the nature of expertise: Reading less and learning more when evaluating digital information. Teachers College Record, 121(11), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811912101102
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 JSSE - Journal of Social Science Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
